HoopTally Game Report

HoopTally

HoopTally Game Report

Norwood Flames vs Central District Lions

Friday, April 10, 2026 @ Division 1

Final Score

Norwood Flames
45
Central District Lions
43

Game Summary

The Norwood Flames secured a narrow 45-43 victory over the Central District Lions in a hard-fought contest, demonstrating resilience to close out the game. Despite a late fourth-quarter surge from the Central District Lions, where they outscored the Flames 14-9, Norwood's consistent offensive output in the first three quarters (leading 11-8, 15-12, 10-9 respectively) proved just enough to maintain their advantage. The game was characterized by low shooting percentages overall, particularly from beyond the arc for both teams, but Norwood’s ability to convert critical shots and maintain a slight lead through much of the game ultimately decided the outcome.

The Norwood Flames exhibited several clear strengths that underpinned their victory. Their perimeter shooting was remarkably efficient, converting 100% of their limited three-point attempts, particularly from the Top3 and RS3 zones, which added crucial points to their tally. Key contributors like #31 (12 points, 1/1 3PT) and #51 (11 points, 1/1 3PT) showcased effective scoring, while #7 contributed significantly with a team-high 3 assists, demonstrating valuable playmaking. Their overall field goal percentage of 43.2% was a substantial advantage over the Central District Lions' 24.0%, highlighting Norwood's superior shot selection and execution in the paint and mid-range, where they converted 50% from the FTMid and RMid zones.

Looking ahead, the Norwood Flames have clear opportunities to build on this success and further develop their game. While their three-point efficiency was perfect, expanding their volume and distribution from beyond the arc, particularly from the corners, could unlock new offensive dimensions. A primary area for growth is ball security; 34 turnovers represent a significant number of lost possessions that, if reduced, would generate more scoring opportunities and alleviate defensive pressure. Additionally, while rebounding was competitive, increasing their presence on the glass could provide more second-chance points and limit the opponent's offensive rhythm. Addressing these areas will allow the Flames to build on their foundational strengths and become an even more formidable and consistent team.

Norwood Flames Box Score

# PTS FG FG% 2PT 2PT% 3PT 3PT% FT FT% TS% OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF
#31 — Kelly 12 4/12 33.3% 3/11 27.3% 1/1 100.0% 3/4 75.0% 43.6% 1 4 5 1 3 0 10 2
#51 — Cho 11 4/8 50.0% 3/7 42.9% 1/1 100.0% 2/2 100.0% 61.9% 0 6 6 0 3 3 6 2
#7 — Forgione 6 3/5 60.0% 3/5 60.0% 0/0 — 0/0 — 60.0% 0 2 2 3 0 0 7 3
#61 — McLean 6 3/7 42.9% 3/7 42.9% 0/0 — 0/0 — 42.9% 0 4 4 1 2 1 2 2
#88 — Gacesa 4 2/4 50.0% 2/4 50.0% 0/0 — 0/0 — 50.0% 1 2 3 0 0 0 1 0
#27 — Lamond 4 2/5 40.0% 2/5 40.0% 0/0 — 0/0 — 40.0% 3 4 7 0 1 0 5 0
#57 — So 2 1/3 33.3% 1/3 33.3% 0/0 — 0/2 0.0% 25.8% 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 2
#8 — Nash 0 0/0 — 0/0 — 0/0 — 0/0 — 0.0% 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 2
TOTAL 45 19/44 43.2% 17/42 40.5% 2/2 100.0% 5/8 62.5% 47.3% 7 23 30 5 9 4 34 13

Central District Lions Box Score

Opponent PTS FG FG% 2PT 2PT% 3PT 3PT% FT FT% TS% OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF
TOTAL 43 18/75 24.0% 18/72 25.0% 0/3 0.0% 7/23 30.4% 25.3% 19 12 31 0 23 1 19 10

Quarter by Quarter

Quarter Team PTS FG 2PT 3PT FT REB AST TO PF
Q1 Norwood Flames 11 5/8 4/7 1/1 0/0 4 2 10 3
Central District Lions 8 4/16 4/16 0/0 0/4 7 0 7 2
Q2 Norwood Flames 15 6/12 6/12 0/0 3/3 9 1 8 3
Central District Lions 12 5/18 5/17 0/1 2/6 5 0 3 2
Q3 Norwood Flames 10 4/9 3/8 1/1 1/4 8 1 9 4
Central District Lions 9 3/23 3/21 0/2 3/8 11 0 3 4
Q4 Norwood Flames 9 4/15 4/15 0/0 1/1 9 1 7 3
Central District Lions 14 6/18 6/18 0/0 2/5 8 0 6 2

Game Flow

Shot Charts — Team & Players

Norwood Flames

12/30 40% 4/8 50% 1/1 100% 0/2 0% 1/2 50% 1/1 100%

#7 — Forgione

1/2 50% 1/2 50% 1/1 100%

#27 — Lamond

1/4 25% 1/1 100%

#31 — Kelly

3/10 30% 0/1 0% 1/1 100%

#51 — Cho

2/5 40% 1/1 100% 0/1 0% 1/1 100%

#57 — So

0/1 0% 1/1 100% 0/1 0%

#61 — McLean

2/5 40% 1/2 50%

#88 — Gacesa

2/3 67% 0/1 0%